
Sarah Gad is one of Minnesota's most sought after medical malpractice lawyers.
"I do not approach medical malpractice cases as a lawyer trying to learn the medicine after the fact. My background in medicine, science, and forensic analysis is part of how I think and how I build a case from the beginning. I read the records closely, reconstruct what happened clinically, question assumptions, and look for the detail that changes the entire case.
I am not interested in simply forwarding records to an expert and waiting for an opinion. I want to understand the medicine myself, identify the pressure points, and know the case well enough to challenge physicians, hospitals, experts, and insurers on their own ground. That combination of medical fluency, forensic analysis, and aggressive litigation is what sets my practice apart."
Medical knowledge. Scientific precision. Serious litigation.
When medical care causes catastrophic harm, understanding what went wrong requires more than reading a chart. Medical-malpractice cases turn on medicine, science, causation, expert testimony, and the ability to identify the details in thousands of pages of records that can determine whether a case succeeds or fails. Attorney Sarah Gad brings an unusual background to that work.
Before becoming a lawyer, Sarah attended the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine on a full scholarship after graduating summa cum laude from the University of Minnesota with degrees in Chemistry and Microbiology. She completed significant medical training and passed the first step of the United States Medical Licensing Examination before ultimately pursuing a career in law. She later worked for nationally known attorney Kathleen T. Zellner, where she served as Forensics Director and worked on complex medical-malpractice and forensic litigation. Today, Sarah brings that combination of medical training, scientific analysis, and high-stakes litigation experience to patients and families harmed by medical negligence throughout Minnesota.
A Medical Background That Matters
Medical-malpractice litigation is different from ordinary personal-injury litigation. The central questions are often highly technical:
-
Did the physician recognize the clinical signs that should have prompted further testing?
-
Was the differential diagnosis reasonable?
-
Did laboratory results, imaging, pathology, medication history, or vital-sign trends indicate a developing emergency?
-
Was surgery performed according to the appropriate standard of care?
-
Did a delay in diagnosis actually change the patient's prognosis?
-
Was the injury an unavoidable complication, or should it have been prevented?
Those questions cannot be answered by looking at the outcome alone.
Sarah's background in clinical medicine and forensic analysis allows her to approach a medical record as more than a collection of documents. She understands the importance of laboratory values, pharmacology, anatomy, pathophysiology, diagnostic reasoning, medical terminology, and the chronology of clinical decision-making. That background also allows her to work closely and efficiently with the physicians and other medical experts whose opinions are often critical to proving a malpractice case.
Experience Developed in High-Stakes Medical Litigation
Before attending the University of Chicago Law School, Sarah worked at the Law Offices of Kathleen T. Zellner & Associates, a nationally recognized litigation firm known for handling complex cases involving record-setting medical malpractice verdicts.
As the firm's Forensics Director, Sarah's work required intensive examination of medical records, scientific evidence, expert opinions, pathology, and other technical evidence. She also worked on medical-malpractice litigation, including cases that resulted in seven-figure settlements. That experience shaped the way Sarah practices law today: understand the evidence completely, find the issue others overlooked, retain the right experts, and prepare the case as though it will ultimately have to be proved at trial.
Medical Malpractice Cases We Investigate
Gad & Gad Law Offices LLP evaluates serious medical-negligence claims involving:
-
Failure to diagnose or delayed diagnosis
-
Cancer misdiagnosis and delayed cancer diagnosis
-
Surgical and postoperative errors
-
Emergency-room negligence
-
Medication and prescription errors
-
Anesthesia errors
-
Hospital negligence
-
Sepsis and failure to recognize infection
-
Stroke and cardiac emergencies
-
Neurological injuries
-
Birth injuries and obstetrical negligence
-
Failure to appropriately monitor a patient
-
Radiology and imaging errors
-
Pathology and laboratory errors
-
Nursing negligence
-
Wrongful death resulting from medical negligence
Not every poor medical outcome constitutes malpractice. The question is whether a health-care provider departed from the applicable standard of care and whether that departure caused the patient's injury. That determination requires careful investigation.
Serious Injuries Deserve Serious Investigation
Hospitals, physicians, and their insurers have experienced lawyers, medical experts, and substantial resources available to defend malpractice claims. Patients should have the same level of preparation on their side.
Sarah approaches medical-malpractice cases the same way she approaches other high-stakes litigation: examine the underlying evidence independently, challenge assumptions, consult the right experts, and prepare to prove the case rather than simply make an accusation.
If you or a family member suffered a serious injury after medical treatment and believe something went wrong, contact our office for a confidential case evaluation.
